FC: Congress considers encryption restrictions in response to attacks

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2001 - 14:03:01 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Reply to crypto restrictions from Tim May; meeting tonight in DC"

    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46816,00.html
       
       Congress Mulls Stiff Crypto Laws
       By Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
       1:45 p.m. Sep. 13, 2001 PDT
       
       WASHINGTON -- The encryption wars have begun.
       
       For nearly a decade, privacy mavens have been worrying that a
       terrorist attack could prompt Congress to ban
       communications-scrambling products that frustrate both police wiretaps
       and U.S. intelligence agencies.
       
       Tuesday's catastrophe, which shed more blood on American soil than any
       event since the Civil War, appears to have started that process.
       
       Some politicians and defense hawks are warning that extremists such as
       Osama bin Laden, who U.S. officials say is a crypto-aficionado and the
       top suspect in Tuesday's attacks, enjoy unfettered access to
       privacy-protecting software and hardware that render their
       communications unintelligible to eavesdroppers.
       
       In a floor speech on Thursday, Sen. Judd Gregg (R-New Hampshire)
       called for a global prohibition on encryption products without
       backdoors for government surveillance.
       
       "This is something that we need international cooperation on and we
       need to have movement on in order to get the information that allows
       us to anticipate and prevent what occurred in New York and in
       Washington," Gregg said, according to a copy of his remarks that an
       aide provided.
       
       President Clinton appointed an ambassador-rank official, David Aaron,
       to try this approach, but eventually the administration abandoned the
       project.
       
       Gregg said encryption makers "have as much at risk as we have at risk
       as a nation, and they should understand that as a matter of
       citizenship, they have an obligation" to include decryption methods
       for government agents. Gregg, who previously headed the appropriations
       committee overseeing the Justice Department, said that such access
       would only take place with "court oversight."
       
       [...]
      
       Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, a hawkish think tank
       that has won accolades from all recent Republican presidents, says
       that this week's terrorist attacks demonstrate the government must be
       able to penetrate communications it intercepts.
       
       "I'm certainly of the view that we need to let the U.S. government
       have access to encrypted material under appropriate circumstances and
       regulations," says Gaffney, an assistant secretary of defense under
       President Reagan.
    
       [...]
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 13 2001 - 14:20:55 PDT