The following excerpts come from Monday's Hotline, a daily political
newsletter read by just about everyone in DC. This message should be read
in a non-proportional typeface like Courier. If your mail reader can't do
that, go to the politechbot.com archives and read it there.
Unfortunately for the clarity of debate here, the
ban-crypto-without-backdoors question is poorly worded ("Should Encryption
Laws Be Reduced To Aid CIA/FBI Surveillance?"), but then again I suspect
most people figured it out. This poll is noteworthy not only for what it
found, but that the pollsters included the crypto question in the first
place. It shows that, all of a sudden, this has become a serious debate in
Washington.
Also note that 72 percent of those surveyed said anti-encryption laws would
be "somewhat" or "very" helpful in preventing similar terrorist attacks.
-Declan
*********
Conducted 9/13-14/01 by Princeton Survey Research Associates; surveyed
1,001 adults aged 18 and over; margin of error +/- 3% (release, 9/15).
Favor Or Oppose The Following?
Favor Oppose
Attack suspected terrorists like bin
Laden even if we're not sure they're
responsible for last week's attack 54% 40%
Attack terrorist bases and countries
that support them even if there is a
high likelihood for civilian casualties 71 21
Fav/Unfav Ratings ----Fav---- ---Unfav---
Very Mostly Mostly Very
Military 58% 36% 2% 2%
FBI 37 48 9 3
CIA 28 44 9 6
How Confident That National And Local Law Enforcement Can Stop
Terrorist Plots In The U.S.
Very Somewhat Not Too Confident Not At All
32% 42% 17% 7%
How Much Would The Following Prevent Similar Terrorist Attacks?
Very Somewhat Not Too Much Not At All
Reduce encryption to
aid CIA/FBI 35 37 12 9
Should Encryption Laws Be Reduced To Aid CIA/FBI Surveillance?
Yes No
54% 39%
U.S. Put Arabs and Arab-Americans Under Special Surveillance?
Agree Disagree
32% 62%
*********
http://www0.mercurycenter.com/premium/business/docs/bizletters16.htm
Headline inflammatory
2001-09-17 05:45:23
I hope, in light of this terrible tragedy, that Dan Gillmor will cease his
whining about personal privacy and recognize that our national security and
the safety of our citizens override his concern about privacy, ``We have
been tested before and survived: Don't let criminals shut down our
freedoms'' (Aug. 12). The government absolutely must have the ability to
monitor all encrypted messages, and anyone sending or receiving encrypted
messages on our soil that cannot be decoded by the appropriate federal
agency must be subject to arrest and seizure of the encryption equipment.
We are at war, and we all, including Gillmor, need to recognize that.
Al Colby
Corralitos
*********
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 17 2001 - 20:39:37 PDT