FC: Dutch journalist reportedly arrested after asking biochem questions

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 12:00:30 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: President Bush on national ID cards; followups to European use"

    *********
    
    From: Rembert Oldenboom <rembertat_private>
    Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:58:34 GMT
    Subject: Reporter arrested in Netherlands
    To: declanat_private
    
    Hi Declan,
    
    Yesterday after business hours a Dutch reporter asked some questions at
    the BVD, the Dutch counterpart of the CIA. This reporter was busy making
    a television program regarding biological warfare which will be
    broadcasted this evening during the program 'Netwerk'.
    
    At 4:00 AM last night five highly armed persons got to her house and
    arrested her. Appearantly her questions raised some suspicoun and
    possibly because these questions got asked after business hours, they
    raised even more suspicioun.
    
    This morning her boyfriend alarmed everyone and the Network cast rang the
    head of the BVD: he didn't know about this arrest at that moment. A
    couple of hours later she was freed again.
    
    Greetz,
    
    Rembert.
    
    *********
    
    From: Rembert Oldenboom <rembertat_private>
    Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:49:01 GMT
    Message-ID: <20010927.11490100at_private>
    Subject: Re: Reporter arrested in Netherlands
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    
     >From the Volkskrant (www.volkskrant.nl) website, roughly translated into
    English:
    
    The reporter arrested had called the BVD almost at the same time as the
    BVD received an anonymous phonecall regarding a bomb which should explode
    somewhere (the letter appeared to be false as are all letters until now).
    The BVD has admitted they had made a mistake.
    Van den Broek had called the BVD regarding their report on chemical and
    biological warfare (which got broadcasted yesterday).  At 10 PM she got
    called on her mobile phone: someone asked if she was named Van den Broek.
    On her confirmation the connection got terminated. Five hours later the
    squad appeared at her door, having a battering ram ready. The squad
    listened to her story but still decided they had to arrest her. The next
    morning at 10 AM she got asked if she wanted to take a shower - at that
    moment she still didn't know why she was arrested.  The editor-in-chief
    of the tv-program called with the police and justice but they didn't know
    about her arrest. A lawyer managed to trace her afterwards and managed to
    get her free. The police excused themselves, gave her flowers and brought
    her home. The reporter didn't want to talk about the incident nor did the
    police or justice: they latter two referred to the BVD. They also excused
    themselves and also gave Van den Broek flowers.
    
    
    Another story:
    
    This morning the Netherlands woke up and learned four major tunnels were
    closed down resulting in huge traffic jams. Cause was an anonymous but
    very detailed letter sent to the press explained cars would explode in
    those tunnels at 8 AM. Those cars were explicity described including
    color, type and place where they got stolen. The impact of the explosions
    should be that strong the tunnels would collapse. The writer didn't
    disagree with the actions against the 'pernicious western world' but felt
    this action would take too many lives. He said he wanted to remain
    anonymous as otherwise he and his family would get hurt. This warning was
    taken very seriously, the Dutch army, heavily armed, investigated every
    car in the traffic jam on a very aggressive and intimidating way. But
    nothing got found and, as far as is known now, no one is arrested. At
    this moment, the tunnels are open for traffic again.
    
    More information can be found on the Volkskrant website at
    www.volkskrant.nl, but that site is in Dutch.
    
    
    
    Finally, regarding the mandatory ID. I'm now sure it's not mandatory
    here. But, as a result of the situation in the US, people are discussing
    this again. Two-third of the people here agree to have an mandatory ID.
    But criticists feel it will only give people a fake sense of security: a
    well-skilled terrorist will definately be able to get himself a false ID.
    The main reason not to have the mandatory ID is indeed sentimental
    historical as the links to the mandatory ID as imposed by the Nazis
    during WW II are still too strong. But it seems this is weakening now.
    
    
    Greetz,
    
    Rembert
    
    And yes, you're free to do with this information whatever you like :-)
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 12:11:47 PDT