FC: Bible-quoting Corinthians.com publisher replies to Politech

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 13:05:16 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Events: Press Club in DC (12/6); SF 12/11; Lessig v. Valenti"

    [Forwarded with permission. The Subject: line of my previous message 
    (http://www.politechbot.com/p-02890.html) may have been a little hasty. The 
    appeals court sent the case back to the district court, which conceivably 
    could still rule in favor of the soccer team. --DBM]
    
    ---
    
    From: "j d sallen" <jdsallenat_private>
    To: "Declan McCullagh" <declanat_private>
    References: <5.1.0.14.0.20011206102742.02328180at_private>
    Subject: Re: U.S. appeals ct: Bible-quoting Corinthians.com owner keeps  domain
    Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:04:32 -0500
    
    Declan,
    
    An enormous THANK YOU for the support and coverage you have provided
    throughout this contretemps. There were many even among those claiming to
    champion the cause of an Internet-for-the-common-person who bought the WIPO
    rhetoric and decided this was simply another case of 'cybersquatting'
    
    Without the attention from news sources such as yours this case almost
    certainly would have just become one more notch in the belt of the
    racketeering corporations and law firms who conspire to bully, and steal
    from, the little guy.
    
    My hope is that this one-sided decision (which also covers my domain
    cruzeiro.com, pirated by another soccer team in Brazil) paves the way for
    penalties for, in the court's words, "overreaching trademark owners," and
    mercenary lawyers (in this case Gottlieb, Rackman & Reisman in cahoots with
    Hutchins, Wheeler & Ditmar), who use flagrant intimidation tactics and
    frivolous law suits to abscond with private property. If such penalties
    existed "Cybersquatting," which today is accurately defined as 'anyone who
    ownes any domain coveted by a corporation," would "mysteriously" disappear
    overnight.
    
    This imbroglio is not over, of course, and I will keep you conversant. For
    now, however, it will be sweet to watch the soccer promo site fall -
    hopefully for good.
    
    Warm Regards,
    
    jdsallen
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Declan McCullagh" <declanat_private>
    To: <politechat_private>
    Cc: <jdsallenat_private>
    Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:32 AM
    Subject: U.S. appeals ct: Bible-quoting Corinthians.com owner keeps domain
    
    
     > Previous message:
     >
     > "Is nothing sacred? Brazilian soccer team wants Bible domain"
     > http://www.politechbot.com/p-01257.html
     >
     > "Corinthians.com bible-quoting owner loses to Brazil soccer team"
     > http://www.politechbot.com/p-01285.html
     >
     > ---
     >
     > http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=01-1197.01A
     >
     > LYNCH, Circuit Judge.  This case raises important issues
     > about the relationship between the Anticybersquatting Consumer
     > Protection Act ("ACPA") and the World Intellectual Property
     > Organization ("WIPO") dispute resolution procedures under the Uniform
     > Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ("UDRP").  This is a dispute
     > between Jay D. Sallen, a resident of Brookline, Massachusetts, and
     > Corinthians Licenciamentos LTDA ("CL"), a Brazilian corporation, over
     > Sallen's registration and use of the domain name corinthians.com.  We
     > are asked to determine whether Sallen, a domain name registrant who has
     > lost the use of a domain name in a WIPO dispute resolution proceeding
     > that declared him a cybersquatter under the UDRP, may bring an action
     > in federal court seeking (1) a declaration that he is not in violation
     > of the ACPA; (2) a declaration that he is not required to transfer the
     > domain name to CL; and (3) such relief as necessary to effectuate these
     > ends.(1) The district court held that federal courts lack jurisdiction
     > over such claims.  For the reasons that follow, we reverse the district
     > court and hold that there is federal jurisdiction over such claims.
     > [...]
     >
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 06 2001 - 13:43:42 PST