FC: Mirror of "sucks" site criticizing Texas mall, from Wayback archive

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Sun Dec 09 2001 - 22:57:48 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: N.J. federal judge rules sex offender info can't go online"

    Previous message:
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-02904.html
    
    ---
    
    Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 22:30:20 -0800
    To: declanat_private
    From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewartat_private>
    Subject: Re: FC: Update on Texas mall assailing critical website with 
    similar name
    Cc: politechat_private, Hankat_private, kieranat_private
    
    Wayback has
    http://web.archive.org/web/20011205065342/http://www.taubmansucks.com/
    dated 12/05/01, though it doesn't seem to have the followon pages,
    like precisely how the law firm harassing him sucks.
    
    A few interesting issues happen when you have a Wayback Machine:
    - Web pages don't automatically disappear just because a site goes down
             or a judge in some country orders it taken down.
    - On the other hand, that doesn't mean you can *depend* on archives;
             the web crawlers don't catch every page that appears, every time,
             and if the page is gone by the time the crawler gets to it, too bad.
             (Unfortunately, this especially means that cracked&scribbled pages
             don't usually get archived in modified versions, and controversial 
    pages
             that are taken down quickly may also get missed.)
    - At some point, the legal system will catch up with the concept of caches 
    and archives.
             That's probably not entirely good - there are judges who still 
    don't get
             what a link means, and issue bans on linking to sites,
             so there may be occasional orders against archive sites who
             aren't directly a party to court actions.
             Will erasing archives be treated as destroying evidence?
             Will archivists be allowed to block their copies without erasing them?
    - There are other cases where sites are destroyed, like the recent attempts
             to close critical public-information sites like
             hazardous-chemical warning sites with the excuse of preventing 
    terrorists
             from accessing them.  The bureaucrats who do this will unfortunately
             be more consistent about doing this than random-lawsuit judges.
             Here in the San Francisco Bay Area, and back where I used to live 
    in New Jersey,
             there are places with all sorts of dangerous materials that could be
             a serious public emergency if something happens -
             and not only does the public have the right to know,
             but firefighters, medical people, and other emergency workers need 
    to know.
    - If a site gets shut down, it's probably worthwhile for someone
             related to or aware of the action to do a quick spider on the archives
             to make sure the material is preserved.
    
                     Bill Stewart
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Dec 09 2001 - 23:16:49 PST