FC: More on Americans love surveillance: Spy on us, please!

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Fri Dec 14 2001 - 13:17:25 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Nanotech group comes to DC, begs for billions in federal $$$"

    ---
    
    From: simpsonat_private
    Subject: Re: FC: Americans love surveillance, poll says: Spy on us, please!
    To: declanat_private
    Cc: simpsonat_private
    Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:54:37 -0500
    
    Hello Declan -
    
          This poll is a good illustration of the inherent weaknesses of public
    opinion polls. Even assuming that the questions were asked using neutral
    language and the results were accurately tabulated -- both of which are big
    assumptions, by the way -- the best that this sort of poll can provide is a
    snapshot of where opinion lies at this moment. The more unsettled and
    unusual the overall social/political situation is, the more volatile public
    opinion is, always.
    
          When Cyber News Service reports Zogby's spin or synopsis of these
    results, they are imposing an order, meaning or frame on this data that is
    scientifically unsound according to the most elementary methodology of
    polling.  The most obvious problem is the implicit claim that their results
    reveal what Americans (who, exactly?) "favor" is an _ongoing_ situation.
    There is no evidence at all of this in a one-time Zogby poll, nor can there
    be. Meanwhile, the trend data on opinions concerning civil liberties
    collected  by polls over the years remains highly contradictory.
    
          Everyone has heard of the apocryphal poll in which respondents
    supposedly rejected the First Amendment. Yet if that question is posed as
    "Do you favor freedom of speech ?" the poll results are completely
    different.  When asked this month if roadblocks and car searches are an
    acceptable tactic to defeat terrorism, many people will say yes. The
    reason? The respondent is stating what he/she thinks should be done with
    'them', the terrorists -- a category in which very few people are willing
    to place themselves. What that same person will say after having been
    intimidated or roughed up by police (or learning what their children,
    relatives, neighbors, etc. have been roughed up) is quite a different
    matter.
    
          As far as I can tell from the cited CNS report, the questions, polling
    methodology, margin of error and specific results of the  Zogby poll are
    presently available. Yet every primer on journalism tells news
    organizations that it is irresponsible to report polling data without also
    making that type of information available. The Associated Press, for
    example, specifically requires that sort of reasonably accurate and
    complete information on the poll itself when reporting on any polling data,
    though whether  AP always lives up to its own standard is another question.
    
          If the Zogby organization or Cyber News Service expects to be taken
    seriously, they should post the information necessary to make an
    independent, informed analysis of the data on which they base their claims.
    
    Regards,
    Christopher Simpson
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Dec 14 2001 - 13:25:11 PST