The Nevada Supreme Court has said police may plant tracking devices on or underneath people's cars without a search warrant. The decision is here: http://www.leg.state.nv.us/scd/118NevAdvOpNo32.html >"...in order for an unreasonable search or seizure to exist, the >complaining individual must have a reasonable expectation of privacy, >which requires both a subjective and an objective expectation of privacy >in the place searched or the item seized. Here, we conclude that Osburn >had neither a subjective nor an objective expectation of privacy in the >bumper of his vehicle." This is a disturbing decision. It refuses to acknowledge what most Americans consider to be commonsense privacy rights. But it is not the first of its kind. In 1999, the Ninth Circuit said pretty much the same thing, when deciding the Fourth Amendment's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures does not apply. In that case, cops trespassed on Christopher McIver's property, planted a GPS bug under his Toyota 4Runner while it was parked in his driveway, followed him around for a while, then arrested him on marijuana charges. See: http://cl.bna.com/cl/19990818/9830145.htm >"McIver did not present any evidence that the placement of the magnetized >tracking devices deprived him of dominion and control of his Toyota >4Runner, nor did he demonstrate that the presence of these objects caused >any damage to the electronic components of the vehicle. Under these >circumstances, we hold that no seizure occurred because the officers did >not meaningfully interfere with McIver's possessory interest in the Toyota >4Runner." -Declan --- From: "paul music" <pmusicat_private> To: "DeClan" <declanat_private>, "Brad Henschel" <attorneys2at_private> Subject: Nevada High Court: Police Can Hide Monitoring Devices on Cars Without Warra Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:47:14 -0500 Apr 25, 2002 Nevada High Court Says Police Can Hide Monitoring Devices on Cars Without Warrant By Brendan Riley Associated Press Writer CARSON CITY, Nev. (AP) - The Nevada Supreme Court ruled Thursday that police can hide electronic monitoring devices on peoples' cars without a warrant for as long as they want. The 5-2 majority opinion, written by Justice Deborah Agosti, said attaching the device to the bumper of a Las Vegas man's car to track his movements did not constitute unreasonable search or seizure under Nevada's Constitution. [...] This story can be found at : http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAQRYEHH0D.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sign this pro-therapeutic cloning petition: http://www.franklinsociety.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 26 2002 - 23:27:59 PDT