FC: Are your pet's medical records private? DogFancy mag reports...

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Tue May 21 2002 - 21:19:15 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: NAI was pursuing PGP copyright violations; Radiusnet replies"

    Previous Politech message:
    
    "National Zoo cites animal 'privacy rights,' refuses to release info"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-03490.html
    
    Sheesh. Can't this be handled by simple, straightforward contracts with 
    your vet? Fine print: We promise not to tell anyone that Fluffy died of 
    malnutrition...
    
    -Declan
    
    ---
    
    Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 22:25:26 -0400
    From: "J.D. Abolins" <jda-irat_private>
    Subject: Dog Fancy magazine: privacy of pet medical records
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    Cc: lawat_private
    
    As I was standing at the checkout line at my local PetSmart store, I 
    glanced at the magazine rack. The cover of the May 2002 issue of Dog Fancy 
    magazine had this teaser: "Are your dog's medical records private?" Once I 
    got off the floor with fits of laughter, I threw in a copy of the magazine 
    in the shopping basket. I had to read the article, especially after the 
    animal privacy rights thread on Politech.
    
    Although the magazine has a Web site at http://www.dogfancy.com, there is 
    no copy of the article (page 15 in the print version) online. Here is an 
    overview of the article "Who's looking at your dog's medical records" by 
    George M. Dennis, J.D..
    
    It turned out to be actually an informative article about the laws 
    concerning disclosure of veterinary records rather than a scare story about 
    poor Fido becoming a victim of identity theft or mass marketers. The 
    article starts off with sound admonition for people not to assume that 
    their dog's veterinary records have the same level of confidentiality as 
    doctors' records for human patients.
    
    Dennis discusses the 1999 revision of the American Veterinary Medical 
    Association's Principles of Veterinary Medical Ethics to declare vet 
    records as private and confidential. While there is the AVMA ethics 
    statement, few states have laws establishing veterinarian-client privilege. 
    Some states' veterinary boards require confidentiality of records. If a 
    state does not have the laws or veterinary board requirements, the client 
    has no legal recourse for disclosure.
    
    But even in states that recognize some vet confidentiality, the privilege 
    is not absolute. There are conditions under which the confidentiality may 
    be lost. E.g.; if the client sue the vet, files a fee dispute claim, or 
    claim that somebody injured the animal (thus, requiring pre-incident health 
    info concerning the animal). A court order or a subpoena can require 
    disclosure. Some states may require disclosure under certain conditions 
    such as contagious livestock diseases.
    
    The law doesn't address who controls the privilege if the dog is switched 
    among owners. Dennis recommends getting consent for access to vet records 
    in writing from the previous owner when acquiring a dog.
    
    As I look at the issue, a major difference between veterinary-client 
    privilege and physician-patient privilege is that the vet's client is the 
    human but the patient is the animal. Privacy with vet records entails both 
    information about the animal and some info about human client. The human 
    would have some privacy concerns about the info concerning the human but 
    the data usually is limited to name, address, and payment history. There 
    may be a consumer privacy issue here. But a claim of privacy specifically 
    for the animal is pushing into hairy territory. <no pun intended> Could 
    that be a beginning of class action suits for neutering/spaying as an 
    intimate form of privacy intrusion? <g>
    
    J.D. Abolins
    
    PS. In one of my emails that was posted on Politech, I mentioned a 
    satirical page where a dog looks at privacy. This page is now up on the Web 
    at http://www.weirdbytes.com/mdog/sec-priv.html
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 21 2002 - 21:50:42 PDT