FC: Sonia Arrison on Berman's P2P bill: "Hollywood hacks consumers"

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Aug 01 2002 - 22:28:20 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Another round in Time Warner cable nastygrams over WiFi access"

    Previous Politech message:
    
    "Peer-to-peer hacking bill officially introduced in House"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-03795.html
    
    ---
    
    Subject: hollywood hacks consumers
    Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 21:43:56 -0700
    From: "Sonia Arrison" <SArrisonat_private>
    To: <declanat_private>
    
    Declan,
    
    This would seem to fit with many of your recent politech posts.  It's one 
    outline of how to deal with copyright issues.
    
    -Sonia
    ----------------------------------------------------
    
    http://www.techcentralstation.com/1051/techwrapper.jsp?PID=1051-250&CID=1051-080102C
    
    Hollywood Hacks Consumers
    By Sonia Arrison
    August 1, 2002
    
    Hollywood wants Congress to pass laws protecting intellectual property 
    against theft on the Internet. But Hollywood lobbying has gone too far with 
    the introduction of a new bill that authorizes copyright holders to hack 
    into peer-to-peer networks.
    
    The Peer to Peer Piracy Prevention Act 
    <http://www.house.gov/berman/p2p.pdf> , sponsored by Hollywood-area 
    Representative Howard Berman 
    <http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00008094&cycle=2002> 
    (D-Calif.) and House subcommittee 
    <http://www.house.gov/judiciary/submembers.htm>  on intellectual property 
    chair Rep. Howard Coble 
    <http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00002247&cycle=2002> 
    (R-N.C.), would allow copyright owners, such as the film and recording 
    industries, to secretly hack into users' computers and unleash new 
    technologies to thwart unauthorized trading of movies or music on 
    peer-to-peer (P2P) networks.
    
    Security experts worry 
    <http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,54153,00.html>  about how 
    authorized hacking could spread viruses, destroy data, and invade privacy. 
    Providers of P2P technologies, like Steve Griffin, CEO of StreamCast 
    Networks, say <http://www.streamcastnetworks.com/FullPress.html>  the bill 
    is tantamount to "cyber warfare" against consumers. Indeed, Rep. Berman 
    indicated that the entertainment industry wants to target consumers because 
    litigation against providers of P2P networks has become futile.
    
    "While the 9th Circuit could shut Napster down because it utilized a 
    central directory and centralized servers, the new P2P networks have 
    increasingly engineered around that decision by incorporating varying 
    levels of decentralization," Rep. Berman said 
    <http://www.house.gov/berman/floor072502.htm> .
    
    Since it is next to impossible to shut down decentralized networks, Rep. 
    Berman and Hollywood hope to intercept and catch the actual people who 
    illegally download music and films. This strategy is flawed not least 
    because there are numerous people to catch and many hackers will probably 
    see this as a reason to counter-attack 
    <http://news.com.com/2100-1023-947072.html>  Hollywood. But there's a 
    larger problem.
    
    Many of Hollywood's Internet pirates are also paying customers in real 
    space, putting Hollywood in the strange position of wanting to attack its 
    own customers. Intellectual property is, of course, important both in 
    principle and to the U.S. economy. But new technologies force intellectual 
    property holders to re-examine their beliefs and business models -- 
    something that the entertainment industry tried and failed to avoid in the 
    past with the introduction of audio and video cassettes. A similar 
    situation is occurring now.
    
    Downloads of pirated music have not visibly impacted purchases of compact 
    disks (CDs), notes University of Texas economist Stan Liebowitz 
    <http://www.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/> , author of a forthcoming book 
    <http://wwwpub.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/netpage.html>  about the digital 
    economy. Liebowitz points out 
    <http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/06/13/liebowitz/index.html>  that 
    downloads of music files are close to five times greater than the total 
    number of CDs sold in the U.S. in a year (and one-and-a-half times the 
    worldwide sales), but CD sales have only declined by five percent, which is 
    what might be expected in a recession.
    
    Liebowitz speculates whether consumers are simply downloading music that 
    they used to copy on audiotape. It could also be that many consumers 
    download songs that they wouldn't buy at the price of a CD anyway, 
    especially if they don't value the other nine songs they are forced to buy 
    on a single album. If this is the case, music companies could actually make 
    more money by recognizing the opportunity to offer their products in 
    different forms.
    
    Consumers will still buy CDs when they are interested in all the songs, but 
    for those songs in which consumers are less interested, music companies 
    might be able to increase sales by lowering prices and offering online 
    singles sales using a micropayment system <http://www.ipin.com/> . The film 
    industry could change its model too.
    
    Videos could be embedded with digital rights management technology (DRM) 
    created by Hollywood, not legislated 
    <http://www.techcentralstation.com/1051/techwrapper.jsp?PID=1051-250&CID=1051-041102A> 
    . This would make unauthorized copying difficult, if not impossible. If 
    consumers could easily order films online at a market price, which may mean 
    greater price differentials than we see now, it's not a stretch to think 
    that the market would expand and everyone will win.
    
    Instead of making consumers the enemy, as Hollywood is doing with support 
    of the P2P Piracy Prevention Act, it would be smarter and more profitable 
    to respond to new technologies with a change in thinking. Consumers will 
    always be willing to pay market prices to be entertained. The challenge is 
    for entertainers to meet the demand with a better model.
    
    Sonia Arrison is director of the Center for Technology Studies 
    <http://www.pacificresearch.org/centers/cts/index.html>  at the 
    California-based Pacific Research Institute <http://www.pacificresearch.org> .
    
    Copyright © 2002 Tech Central Station - www.techcentralstation.com
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 01 2002 - 23:58:10 PDT