FC: Debunking the idea of a lie detector test, by Alan Zelicoff

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Mon Aug 26 2002 - 23:25:18 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Entertainment lobbyists have new opponent: Verizon and Baby Bells"

    ---
    
    From: Kevin Christopher <kchristopherat_private>
    To: "'declanat_private'" <declanat_private>
    Subject: Continued Controversy over Polygraphs for Congressmen
    Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:48:40 -0400
    
    Declan:
    
    Alan Zelicoff is Sandia National Laboratories' senior scientist at the
    Center for National Security and Arms Control in Albuquerque, NM. He's also
    a courageous and vocal critic of the polygraph. Last year, Skeptical
    Inquirer published his commentary, "Polygraphs and the National Labs:
    Dangerous Ruse Undermines National Security"
    (http://www.csicop.org/si/2001-07/polygraph.html). Zelicoff has been active
    in many other national issues since, especially biological terrorism, but he
    has been fairly quiet on the "polygraph = pseudoscience" issue -- until this
    month.
    
    Zelicoff wrote a hard-hitting op-ed column "Polygraph Hypocrisy," published
    in the August 9, 2002, Washington Post. In it, Zelicoff condemns Alabama
    Senator Richard Shelby for a hypocritical stance on polygraphs. Shelby
    joined other senators in rejecting the recent proposal to subject members of
    Congress to a polygraph, but, according to Zelicoff, he was behind
    legislation for a program to polygraph 15,000 scientists at the Department
    of Energy. A substantial excerpt of the Post op-ed can be found at
    http://antipolygraph.org/news.shtml).
    
    Shelby's office denies that he was behind this legislation, but Zelicoff
    claims he got the info from unnamed congressional sources (see
    http://www.abqjournal.com/paperboy/ia/news/756381news08-22-02.htm).
    
    The public relations fallout from Zelicoff's op-ed has been interesting to
    say the least. According to a story in yesterday's Albuquerque Journal,
    Zelicoff claims that senior executives from Sandia and the Department of
    Energy had urged him not to submit his op-ed column and, in one instance,
    resorted to using what he took as a thinly veiled threat. Sandia's vice
    president for public relations admits that he called Zelicoff and told him
    the story of a Lockheed-Martin employee fired for comments made to the
    press, but he denies that was using the tale as a threat. Lockheed Martin
    manages Sandia for the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security
    Administration.
    (http://www.abqjournal.com/paperboy/ia/news/756381news08-22-02.htm).
    
    Current polygraph info, links and more at http://www.antipolygraph.org/.
    
    Regards,
    
    Kevin Christopher
    Public Relations Director
    Skeptical Inquirer
    P.O. Box 703
    Amherst, NY 14226
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
    CNET Radio 9:40 am ET weekdays: http://cnet.com/broadband/0-7227152.html
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 27 2002 - 01:23:55 PDT