FC: California univ. student punished for... posting event flyer

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Wed Jul 02 2003 - 22:07:32 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Replies about what to do when an auction seller lies about you"

    ---
    
    Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:02:04 -0500 (EST)
    From: "Thor L. Halvorssen" <thorat_private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    
    To: Declan McCullagh
    From: Thor L. Halvorssen
    
    Cal Poly Student Punished for Posting Flier
    Public University Gives Veto to Students Who Claim "Offense"
    
    SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA -- In the spring of 2003, a student at the California 
    Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) was found guilty of "disruption" 
    for posting a flier -- in a public area -- that some students found 
    "offensive."  The public university placed unequal rights above the Bill of 
    Rights.  "Allowing some individuals to veto the protected expression of 
    others is an unconscionable betrayal of Cal Poly's moral and legal 
    obligations," said Thor L. Halvorssen, CEO of the Foundation for Individual 
    Rights in Education (FIRE).
    
    On November 12, 2002, Steve Hinkle, an undergraduate and a member of the 
    Cal Poly College Republicans (CPCR), posted fliers advertising a speech by 
    Mason Weaver, author of "It's OK to Leave the Plantation."  In that book, 
    Weaver argues that dependence on the government puts many African-Americans 
    in circumstances similar to slavery.  Weaver's speech was sponsored by both 
    CPCR and the student government.  The flier contained merely the title of 
    the book, a photograph of the author (who is African-American), and the 
    time and location of the speech.
    
    When Hinkle sought to post a flier on a public bulletin board in the 
    Multicultural Center, several students approached him.  They claimed that 
    they were "offended" by the flier and that it was in violation of the 
    Center's posting policy.  Hinkle left to check the policy, confirming that 
    he was indeed in compliance.  While he was gone, one of the students called 
    the university police.  The officer summoned to the Center stated in 
    writing that he was investigating a report of "a suspicious white male 
    passing out literature of an offensive racial nature."
    
    The students in the Multicultural Center admit trying to prevent Hinkle 
    from advertising the event.  Charges were brought not against these 
    censors, however, but against Hinkle himself.  On January 29, 2003, Cal 
    Poly charged Hinkle with "disruption" of a "campus event."  The students 
    who objected to the posting of the flier claimed that they were holding a 
    Bible study dinner and meeting at the time of the incident.  The 
    university's "finding of facts" notes that the Bible study group is not 
    officially recognized, that the bulletin board is in a public "student 
    lounge area," and that no notice of any kind indicated that a meeting was 
    underway at the time.
    
    In February, Cal Poly subjected Hinkle to a lengthy hearing.  He was denied 
    the right to have a lawyer present at the proceedings, but his faculty 
    advisor made a transcript.  At that hearing, Cornel Morton, vice president 
    for student affairs, told Hinkle: "You are a young white male member of 
    CPCR.  To students of color, this may be a collision of experience....  The 
    chemistry has racial implications, and you are naive not to acknowledge 
    those."
    
    On March 12, Vice Provost W. David Conn found Hinkle guilty.  Conn ordered 
    Hinkle to write letters of apology to the offended students.  The 
    sentencing letter from Conn stated that the text of the apology would be 
    subject to the approval of the Office of Judicial Affairs.   The letter 
    also warned that "there is no parameter or guarantee regarding the 
    confidentiality of the letter [of apology]" and that "this decision is 
    final."  Conn informed Hinkle that if he did not accept this punishment, he 
    would face much stiffer penalties, up to expulsion.
    
    Hinkle submitted his case to FIRE.  On April 15, 2003, Greg Lukianoff, 
    FIRE's director of legal and public advocacy, wrote to Cal Poly President 
    Warren J. Baker, urging him to defend Steve Hinkle's fundamental 
    constitutional rights.  Lukianoff demonstrated the absurdity of a 
    "disruption" charge against someone who was silently posting, on a public 
    bulletin board, a flier for an approved campus event.  Moreover, Lukianoff 
    wrote, the "disrupted" students were "not a recognized student group and 
    the 'meeting' was therefore not a 'campus function.'  Ironically, Mr. 
    Hinkle was actually posting fliers for an event that was sponsored by a 
    recognized student group and by the student government, and it is he who 
    has the far better claim to 'campus function' status."
    
    Lukianoff continued: "All accounts agree that Mr. Hinkle, who only wanted 
    to post a flier, was then approached by the students -- not the other way 
    around."  Hinkle's accusers, he noted, "themselves initiated what they 
    later claimed was his 'disruption'....If they had allowed Mr. Hinkle to go 
    about his constitutionally protected activity, there would have been no 
    'disruption' at all.  All of this leads FIRE to draw the obvious 
    conclusion: Mr. Hinkle and the CPCR are being punished for the content of 
    their expression."
    
    On May 9, 2003, Cal Poly's legal counsel, Carlos Cordova, responded to 
    FIRE's letter.  Cordova denied any wrongdoing and did not substantively 
    address any of FIRE's specific concerns.  Today, Steve Hinkle remains 
    punished for trying to post a factual, simple, and constitutionally 
    protected flier.
    
    "I have been distracted from my studies because a handful of my fellow 
    students want to see me punished for the content of my flier," Hinkle 
    said.  "With FIRE in my corner, I now hope that Cal Poly will be made to 
    respect my free speech rights."
    
    "Cal Poly grants selected students abusive control over the expression of 
    other students," Halvorssen noted.  "Disagreement, now called 'offense,' is 
    all it takes to get Cal Poly administrators to launch an inquiry and secure 
    a conviction on a spurious charge of 'disruption.'  Cal Poly gives some 
    people the power to veto what others have to say.  Students at that 
    institution now live in insecure possession of their most basic First 
    Amendment rights."
    
    The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education is a nonprofit 
    educational foundation. FIRE unites civil rights and civil liberties 
    leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals across the 
    political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, freedom 
    of expression, freedom of conscience, and due process on our nation's 
    campuses. FIRE's efforts to preserve liberty at Cal Poly and elsewhere can 
    be seen by visiting www.thefire.org.
    
    CONTACT:
    Thor L. Halvorssen, CEO, FIRE: 215-717-3473; fireat_private
    
    Greg Lukianoff, Director of Legal and Public Advocacy, FIRE: 215-717-3473; 
    gregat_private
    
    Warren J. Baker, President, Cal Poly: (805) 756-6000; wbakerat_private 
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 03 2003 - 02:45:30 PDT