--- From: "Downes, Stephen" <Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> To: "'Declan McCullagh'" <declan@private> Subject: RE: [Politech] Auditor finds shocking abuses by ex-Canadian priva cy commissioner [priv] Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 15:03:53 -0400 You'll note, I hope, that this is the auditing system working the way it should, catching unjustified expenses and dubious expense accounts. The phrase 'no bureaucrat is safe' should say 'no dishonest bureaucrat is safe' - the vast majority of people who have been audited receive positive reports from the auditor general, mainly because they spent the taxpayers' money in a respectful and reasonable fashion. Of course, that won't get any media play. -- Stephen ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- Stephen Downes ~ E-Learning Group ~ National Research Council Canada stephen@private -~- http://www.downes.ca For free daily news and information about e-learning and related technology, visit OLDaily at http://www.downes.ca/news ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- --- From: "adam beecher" <lists@private> To: "Declan McCullagh" <declan@private>, <jim.harper@private> Subject: RE: [Politech] Why not to have a privacy commissioner,from Jim Harper [priv] Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 18:47:40 +0100 Hi Jim, Declan, > Credit where credit is due: At least Canada will punish what > wrongdoing is found. > As they should. If this isn't a whitewash, obviously. > Europe probably gives its privacy bureaucrats <i>carte > blanche</i> to free-spend tax dollars. > Why the anti-European rhetoric? Could you not just have stopped after the first sentence, instead of pigeonholing an entire continent? We use euros over here by the way, not dollars. Is that anti-american? :) adam --- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 18:40:35 +0100 From: David Cantrell <david@private> Organization: Siberian Heavy Industries and Fur Concern To: Declan McCullagh <declan@private> Subject: Re: [Politech] Why not to have a privacy commissioner, from Jim Harper [priv] References: <6.0.0.22.2.20031002123558.01faa9c0@private> >I don't know if you've seen this, but Canada's Privacy Commissioner >fiasco continues. Uh-huh. So because one particular example of a privacy commissioner may have been a criminal scumbag, there should be no privacy commissioners at all. Mr. Harper really is being spectacularly stupid here. Of course, by Harper's silly argument, there should be no president of the US because there has been a criminal in the white house. And there should be no libertarians because some libertarians are criminals. And so on. -- Lord Protector David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david If a job's worth doing, it's worth dieing for _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 03 2003 - 06:59:43 PDT