[Politech] Reply to study saying speed cameras don't work [priv]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Fri Nov 07 2003 - 06:25:50 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] Implications of report by Postal Service commission [priv][fs]"

    ---
    
    Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 11:50:27 +1100
    From: Tony Healy <thealy@private>
    Subject: Re: [Politech] New study says speed cameras don't work [priv]
    In-reply-to: <6.0.0.22.2.20031015083536.0210afa8@private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declan@private>
    
    Declan
    
    I have prepared a response to Alan Buckingham's study that claims speed
    cameras don't work. The main points are:
    
    1. the crash types excluded from the speed category by Buckingham should not
    be excluded; they are caused or exacerbated by speeding and can be addressed
    by anti-speeding measures. Examples include jack-knifing, slippery roads and
    aggressive driving. So the proportion of crashes caused by speeding is not 7
    percent as Buckingham claims, but the 30 to 40 percent claimed by road
    safety researchers.
    
    2. crashes are biassed towards low speeds for many reasons, but this does
    not indicate that lawful travelling is more dangerous than speeding. For
    example, many crashes occur when vehicles are entering or leaving the
    traffic stream, and thus travelling slower than the stream or even stopped.
    
    3. the plateauing in crash statistics that Buckingham comments on has
    several possible explanations, but Buckingham does not consider them. For
    example, they could result simply from education and advocacy programs
    having reached all reasonable drivers, and now being stalled on a hard core
    of speedsters. Or they might result from the effect of talking on mobile
    phones, which became prominent during the 1990's and which causes crashes.
    
    4. the Australian experience clearly shows speed cameras reducing fatalities
    where they're installed. Crash reductions range from 46 percent to 95
    percent over three year periods.
    
    http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=839
    
    
    Declan, please remove my email address if you use this message.
    
    Regards, Tony Healy
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Nov 07 2003 - 07:26:34 PST