[Politech] What's new in the Senate version of CAN-SPAM bill [sp]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 06:05:14 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] What Fed spam bill could have been, by EPIC [sp]"

    http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-5111893.html?tag=nefd_lede
    
    The latest version of CAN-SPAM, approved by the Senate, includes at least 
    four changes:
    
    • Under the House bill, once commercial e-mail senders obtained 
    "affirmative consent" from recipients, they would not have to follow 
    certain rules such as providing an easy way to unsubscribe from future 
    mailings. The Senate proposal eliminates that language.
    
    • State attorneys general would, according to the House bill, have a 
    tougher time seeking injunctions against spammers engaged in header forgery 
    or who bounced mail through networks "accessed without authorization." The 
    Senate bill makes it easier to stop them. The Senate bill also would make 
    it easier for the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications 
    Commission to obtain cease-and-desist orders against header-forging or 
    network-intruding spammers.
    
    • The House proposal gives federal judges more discretion in granting 
    "reasonable attorney fees" to state attorneys general. The Senate version 
    does not.
    
    • The Senate version broadens the definition of what qualifies as spam sent 
    to mobile devices.
    
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 06:32:10 PST