[Politech] What Fed spam bill could have been, by EPIC [sp]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 06:10:47 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] Why Fed antispam law is not a paper tiger, by Jim Halpert [sp]"

    ---
    
    Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 08:28:02 -0500
    To: Declan McCullagh <declan@private>, politech@private
    From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@private>
    Subject: What Fed Spam Bill Could Have Been, by EPIC
    
    Declan -
    
    I testified before the Senate this May on thespam  bill. EPIC also worked
    with a wide range of civil liberties and consumer organizations on a
    "Policy Framework for Effective Spam Legislation."
    
    Regards.
    
    Marc Rotenberg
    
    
    
    	EPIC Senate Testimony on Spam (May 21, 2003)
    
    	http://www.epic.org/privacy/junk_mail/spam/spamtestimony5.21.
    	03.html
    
    	Mr. Chairman, spam is a complex problem. There is no simple
    	legislative solution. A multi-tiered approach that includes
    	aggressive enforcement, better technology for identifying and
    	filtering spam, and cooperation at the state and international
    	level will all be necessary. In addition, baseline federal
    	legislation that gives users the opportunity to go after
    	spammers and ensures that marketing lists are built on
    	explicit consent and not on deception is a critical part of
    	the effort to stem the tide of undesired commercial e-mail.
    
    
    	Policy Framework for Effective Spam Legislation (July 18, 2003)
    	http://www.privacycoalition.org/spam_letter.html
    
    	-- opt-in, private right of action, freedom for states to
    	pursue spammers, technical measures, and international
        	cooperation
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 06:44:57 PST