[Politech] EPIC supporter says group has "crossed line" in anti-Gmail campaign [priv]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 21:39:08 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] Update on electronic voting in Ireland"

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: FW: Opposition to your stance on Gmail [REMOVEEMAIL]
    Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 16:55:17 -0700
    From: Ilya Haykinson
    To: 'Declan McCullagh' <declan@private>
    
    Declan,
    
    
    
    FYI - this is what I sent to EPIC.
    
    
    
       _____
    
    From: Ilya Haykinson
    Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 3:57 PM
    To: 'info@private'; 'rotenberg@private'
    Subject: Opposition to your stance on Gmail
    
    
    
    Hello,
    
    
    
    As a long-time supporter of privacy initiatives on the Internet, and a
    supporter of many organizations that speak out for privacy and freedom in
    the information age (I have supported the EFF and ACM for several years), I
    have always wanted to give my support to your organization for its
    outstanding work.
    
    
    
    However, with your recent stance on Gmail (and especially the letters to the
    CA state attorney general), I feel that you have crossed the line between
    privacy and anti-commercialism. In my opinion, the Gmail service is not any
    different than any other web mail service, with the exception that it is
    better and easier to use. The scanning of mail by computers is done by every
    anti-spam program. The retention of deleted mail in backups is done by every
    company offering email services. Advertising support of free email services
    is a feature of every commercial email service.
    
    
    
    I believe that the question about Gmail is _not_ a question for government
    regulation, or even industry uproar. It is a question for individuals -
    whether to use the service or not. The privacy policy and all the related
    information on that site clearly states exactly what Google is planning to
    do with the emails you get.
    
    
    
    I think that your organization has become misguided in its quest to preserve
    privacy on the Internet. Instead of Google, your organization should be
    lobbying the attorney general to do something about spyware that is often
    advertising in misleading ways, contains marginally-truthful privacy policy
    if it even has one at all, and is completely impossible to remove from a
    computer system. Your organization needs to lobby governments of countries
    that proxy data, scanning for offensive keywords and then persecuting people
    exercising their freedom of speech. Your organization needs to pursue
    "opt-out" spammers with no return addresses.
    
    
    
    By pursuing Google, you are implicitly not pursuing these true privacy
    violations as much as you could have. And for that, you would not be able to
    gain my or any of my acquaintances' support.
    
    
    
    Sincerely,
    
    
    
    -ilya haykinson
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 04 2004 - 22:23:10 PDT