What about Propolice - according to a recent mail from the OpenBSD folks, Propolice is portable, and slightly better than StackGuard. What's stopping THAT from getting integrated... Not that RedHat really cares what the GCC people say, since they've used a frankenstien GCC in past distributions...you'd think, they, at least, would include stackguard or propolice as the default. -dave On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:08:58 -0800 Crispin Cowan <crispinat_private> wrote: > Dave Aitel wrote: > > >Does anyone on this list have any connection with the GCC developers? > >When is StackGuard and -blip going to get integrated into the > >standard distribution?! What are we waiting on? Mono? > > > We are working towards that. Having a feature accepted into GCC > requires some key things: > > * that the patch is current with GCC, which is a fast-moving > target* that the patch is portable across architectures > > We are essentially current with GCC, in that we have an in-the-lab > version of StackGuard/GCC 3.2. We are working on an IA64 port of > StackGuard, so that we can credibly claim that StackGuard is portable > by porting it. > > If anyone out there has particular expertise on some other CPU, and > wants to help, we'll take it. > > When we get all that done, there's the small matter of persuading the > GCC core maintainers to accept StackGuard, because they don't have to > if they don't want to. > > Crispin > > -- > Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. > Chief Scientist, WireX http://wirex.com/~crispin/ > Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org > Available for purchase: > http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html > Just say ".Nyet" > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 30 2003 - 14:19:11 PST