Re: 'non-rfc' compliant ping command in win98/win2k - or?

From: ___cliff rayman___ (cliffat_private)
Date: Tue Jul 31 2001 - 11:40:36 PDT

Next message: sween: "Citrix ICA Client Access Advisory(?)"

Previous message: Tony Lambiris: "RE: WindowMaker bug"
In reply to: knud_erik højgaard: "'non-rfc' compliant ping command in win98/win2k - or?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

u could load ethereal or use your favorite packet sniffer
on your linux box.  see what the difference in the packets
actually is.

"knud_erik højgaard" wrote:

> 1 cisco 677 with CBOS 2.3.0
>
> --snip--
>
> win95: router doesn't crash
> win98: router crashes
> winNT: router doesn't crash
> win2K: router crashes
> Linux: router doesn't crash, tried with hping2, no effect either.
> *BSD : router doesn't crash
>
> --snip--
>
> Whats the difference? why is it there? does the ping command in 98/2k send
> 'illegal' data along with the packets? or are the others misbehaving? I have
> no idea.. maybe you do.
>

--
___cliff rayman___cliffat_private___http://www.genwax.com/

Next message: sween: "Citrix ICA Client Access Advisory(?)"
Previous message: Tony Lambiris: "RE: WindowMaker bug"
In reply to: knud_erik højgaard: "'non-rfc' compliant ping command in win98/win2k - or?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 31 2001 - 12:09:59 PDT