News flash: You and your kin are not the entire world. Wouldn't you like M$ to pay attention to those laws? Where do you think the vulnerabilities come from? Markus Kern wrote: > > Meritt James wrote: > > > > THAT is an informative statement! If a bit of consideration for the law > > was made, there would be many fewer vulnerabilities in the first place. > > How would consideration for the law reduce _vulnerabilities_? > > I have to agree with Michael Rudel. > When we're discussing the ethics/morals of something current laws are > irrelevant. > Laws are deduced from the outcome of such discussions (or that's the way > I think it should be). So why are YOU discussing laws, followed by a statement that what you wrote is irelevant? > > But thanks for the job security! > > > > "Michael R. Rudel" wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > It is illegal under current law, but > > > that doesn't mean jack to me. > > > > [snip] -- James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA Booz, Allen & Hamilton phone: (410) 684-6566
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 11:47:09 PDT