On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Meritt James wrote: > News flash: You and your kin are not the entire world. > > Wouldn't you like M$ to pay attention to those laws? Where do you think > the vulnerabilities come from? > > Markus Kern wrote: > > > > Meritt James wrote: > > > > > > THAT is an informative statement! If a bit of consideration for the law > > > was made, there would be many fewer vulnerabilities in the first place. > > > > How would consideration for the law reduce _vulnerabilities_? > > > > I have to agree with Michael Rudel. > > When we're discussing the ethics/morals of something current laws are > > irrelevant. > > Laws are deduced from the outcome of such discussions (or that's the way > > I think it should be). > > So why are YOU discussing laws, followed by a statement that what you > wrote is irelevant? Just because I don't care doesn't mean others won't, and it doesn't mean that actions shouldn't be taken to change the laws if they are "morally or ethnically wrong". > > > > But thanks for the job security! > > > > > > "Michael R. Rudel" wrote: > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > It is illegal under current law, but > > > > that doesn't mean jack to me. > > > > > > [snip] > > -- > James W. Meritt, CISSP, CISA > Booz, Allen & Hamilton > phone: (410) 684-6566 > ------------------------------------------------------- Michael R. Rudel * 734.417.4859 * mrrat_private AOL AIM: ATSTheory * Cell E-Mail: pageat_private Student Technician, Pinckney Community Schools Principal Engineer, Michael R. Rudel Consulting
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Sep 08 2001 - 10:36:01 PDT