RE: possible AIM dos?

From: Clarke, Matthew J (CLARKE06at_private)
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 07:40:12 PDT

  • Next message: Deigodudeat_private: "Re: possible AIM dos?"

    SOmeone does not need to send you a message though, attacks like this are
    very popular against people who are "away". when you are away your aim
    client automaticly responds to a IM allowing you to warn the person 3 times.
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Matthew Sachs [mailto:matthewgat_private]
    Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 9:22 PM
    To: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: Re: possible AIM dos?
    
    
    On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:14:44PM -0400, John Scimone wrote:
    > After reading this outdated article regarding AOL Instant Messenger's
    "warn" 
    > feature:
    > 
    > http://www.attrition.org/security/denial/w/aim-warn.dos.html
    > 
    > I began to wonder what type of restrictions were put on it.  Does anyone
    know 
    > what is stopping someone from registering multiple screen names, then
    sending 
    > warnings from each of those names, all targeted at the same user thus
    keeping 
    > that user at a 100% warning level denying them the instant messenger
    service 
    > for the most part? 
    > any thoughts are appreciated.
    > thanks.
    
    In order to be able to warn someone, that person needs to have, say,
    sent you an instant message.  You can only warn someone once for every
    IM they send you.
    
    -- 
    Matthew Sachs   <matthewgat_private>  <matthewgat_private>
    http://www.zevils.com/ * GPG key: 0x600A0342 * PGP key: 0x93EA1151
    #The original nonstandard deviant# (((T^E)%(PQ))^D)%(PQ) = RSA-NOP
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 10 2001 - 21:31:15 PDT