RE: Civil Disobedience

From: George Milliken (gmillikenat_private)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2001 - 21:34:27 PDT

  • Next message: George Milliken: "RE: Civil Disobedience"

    It's not just the prison term, it's the investigative methods proposed that
    are worrisome.  The personal freedoms they are taking (in the name of
    freedom of course) affect everyone.
    
    magoo
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:Ejay.Hireat_private]
    Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:49 PM
    To: 'br0ken halo'; vuln-devat_private
    Subject: RE: Civil Disobedience
    
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    Don't you think "hacking is a victimless crime" is a bit soft?  I
    agree it doesn't merit life inprisonment, but it still has an impact
    on its' victims.
    
    - -----Original Message-----
    From: br0ken halo [mailto:x_burningat_private]
    Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 3:55 PM
    To: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: RE: Civil Disobedience
    
    
    
    I agree that this bill is *very* unneeded...to say, to even make the
    comparison between a hacker and a terrorist is absurd! Terrosim kills
    people, hacking is a victimless crime. People go on and on about how
    our
    'national' infrastructure is at *grave* risk from evil hackers and
    that
    these evil hackers could destroy power grids, shut off our water, and
    cause
    the beginning of the freaking holocaust - yet have we actually seen
    any real
    world proof of this? This kind of thinking is only propaganda, as is
    the
    hacker - terrorist comparison.
    
    Beefing up the sentences on hackers/crackers/virus writers and the
    like is
    complete stupidity. It's a simple 'we don't really care about how the
    problem gets fixed, as long as it does get fixed' attitude. Thats
    exactly
    what this bill represents. The way to defeat the script kid is
    through good
    security practices through solid communication and deployment of the
    tools
    necessary to achieve a secure computing enviroment. This includes but
    is not
    limited to security lists, good security information websites such as
    http://www.securityfocus.com and the like. The only way security
    experts and
    administrators can secure their computing enviroment is by using the
    same
    tools that the hackers use to break into them. When you take away
    these
    tools from the security experts/administrators (as well as the script
    kids
    who use them), you're denying them the 'civil liberty' of taking
    matters
    into their own hands (as well they should!) to secure their computing
    enviroment. The spread of Information and good security practices is
    what
    will stop hackers from commiting crimes. Not beefing up sentences.
    
    Can you really justify sending an 18 year old kid to federal prison
    because
    he hacked your box?
    
    ___________________________________________________________
    I live in a world of Paradox - My weakness` are your
    strengths, your wisdom is my stupidity, and your victorys
    are my losses, a victory that won't last.
    ___________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    - ----Original Message Follows----
    From: "pomalley(contr-ird)" <pomalleyat_private>
    To: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: RE: Civil Disobedience
    Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 14:53:07 -0400
    
    This is just my 2cents worth but...
    
    Has anyone bothered to read the bill as it was passed?  The bit about
    hacking being punishable by life imprisonment was removed before it
    passed.
    
    
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:2:./temp/~c107RpB60w::
    
    
    
    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Felix von Leitner [mailto:leitnerat_private]
    Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 13:42
    To: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: Re: Civil Disobedience
    
    Thus spake John Thornton (jthorntonat_private):
     >  I ask each and every one of you to join me in this protest.
    
    Why not conduct port scans from the IP of the White House, Capitol,
    CIA,
    DEA and other law enforcement agencies and see whom the FBI arrests?
    
    This is some serious shit, people!  Not reporting is not the way to
    go.
    This law has to be proven ineffective and harmful.  That means:
    
       a. computer crime must not go down, or they will think the law was
          effective
       b. computer crim must not go up, or they will make laws with even
    more
          severe punishment.
    
    Talk to your representatives about this!  Explain to them that this
    law
    makes it impossible to learn computer security from the ground up,
    which
    means that there will be no more qualified new computer security
    people
    in ten years, which means all the good security companies will not be
    in
    the USA, which means less jobs, less taxes and more poverty.
    
    Felix
    
    
    
    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
    http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
    
    iQA/AwUBO8tm3QfGUZh0Fm3JEQLWVgCdGcvxlZ7u0vQNKkMmQmLGa5NMvjIAoPKN
    xNr4h2S8osoB12sqFnCIojUi
    =rUx9
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 23:37:31 PDT