RE: Civil Disobedience

From: Hire, Ejay (Ejay.Hireat_private)
Date: Mon Oct 15 2001 - 14:49:21 PDT

  • Next message: bknightat_private: "Buffer overflow vulnerability in action argument of dtaction"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    Don't you think "hacking is a victimless crime" is a bit soft?  I
    agree it doesn't merit life inprisonment, but it still has an impact
    on its' victims.
    
    - -----Original Message-----
    From: br0ken halo [mailto:x_burningat_private]
    Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 3:55 PM
    To: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: RE: Civil Disobedience
    
    
    
    I agree that this bill is *very* unneeded...to say, to even make the 
    comparison between a hacker and a terrorist is absurd! Terrosim kills
    people, hacking is a victimless crime. People go on and on about how
    our 
    'national' infrastructure is at *grave* risk from evil hackers and
    that 
    these evil hackers could destroy power grids, shut off our water, and
    cause 
    the beginning of the freaking holocaust - yet have we actually seen
    any real 
    world proof of this? This kind of thinking is only propaganda, as is
    the 
    hacker - terrorist comparison.
    
    Beefing up the sentences on hackers/crackers/virus writers and the
    like is 
    complete stupidity. It's a simple 'we don't really care about how the
    problem gets fixed, as long as it does get fixed' attitude. Thats
    exactly 
    what this bill represents. The way to defeat the script kid is
    through good 
    security practices through solid communication and deployment of the
    tools 
    necessary to achieve a secure computing enviroment. This includes but
    is not 
    limited to security lists, good security information websites such as
    http://www.securityfocus.com and the like. The only way security
    experts and 
    administrators can secure their computing enviroment is by using the
    same 
    tools that the hackers use to break into them. When you take away
    these 
    tools from the security experts/administrators (as well as the script
    kids 
    who use them), you're denying them the 'civil liberty' of taking
    matters 
    into their own hands (as well they should!) to secure their computing
    enviroment. The spread of Information and good security practices is
    what 
    will stop hackers from commiting crimes. Not beefing up sentences.
    
    Can you really justify sending an 18 year old kid to federal prison
    because 
    he hacked your box?
    
    ___________________________________________________________
    I live in a world of Paradox - My weakness` are your
    strengths, your wisdom is my stupidity, and your victorys
    are my losses, a victory that won't last.
    ___________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    - ----Original Message Follows----
    From: "pomalley(contr-ird)" <pomalleyat_private>
    To: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: RE: Civil Disobedience
    Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 14:53:07 -0400
    
    This is just my 2cents worth but...
    
    Has anyone bothered to read the bill as it was passed?  The bit about
    hacking being punishable by life imprisonment was removed before it
    passed.
    
    
    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:2:./temp/~c107RpB60w::
    
    
    
    - -----Original Message-----
    From: Felix von Leitner [mailto:leitnerat_private]
    Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 13:42
    To: vuln-devat_private
    Subject: Re: Civil Disobedience
    
    Thus spake John Thornton (jthorntonat_private):
     >  I ask each and every one of you to join me in this protest.
    
    Why not conduct port scans from the IP of the White House, Capitol,
    CIA,
    DEA and other law enforcement agencies and see whom the FBI arrests?
    
    This is some serious shit, people!  Not reporting is not the way to
    go.
    This law has to be proven ineffective and harmful.  That means:
    
       a. computer crime must not go down, or they will think the law was
          effective
       b. computer crim must not go up, or they will make laws with even
    more
          severe punishment.
    
    Talk to your representatives about this!  Explain to them that this
    law
    makes it impossible to learn computer security from the ground up,
    which
    means that there will be no more qualified new computer security
    people
    in ten years, which means all the good security companies will not be
    in
    the USA, which means less jobs, less taxes and more poverty.
    
    Felix
    
    
    
    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
    http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
    
    iQA/AwUBO8tm3QfGUZh0Fm3JEQLWVgCdGcvxlZ7u0vQNKkMmQmLGa5NMvjIAoPKN
    xNr4h2S8osoB12sqFnCIojUi
    =rUx9
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 15 2001 - 17:02:45 PDT