RE: Developerstore.com expose critical customer info

From: sq (sqat_private)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2002 - 14:41:05 PST

  • Next message: Dug Song: "Re: RPC/TCP Record Marking for IDS Evasion"

    > So, now you know, and no one but the poster, myself,
    > and whoever else he told or figured it out on their own had a chance to
    > exploit it.
    
    It posted to webappsecat_private, and (probably) focus-msat_private yesteday (1/10)... so I suspect a lot of people knew.
    
    
    
    > > http://developerstore.com/devstore/productSearch.asp?searchText=
    > > |')%20union%20all%20select%201,name%20from%20sysobjects%20where%20
    > > type='U'--
    > 
    > You'll notice that this doesn't work any more.  I did work just fine 
    > when the note was sent to vuln-dev.  I purposely held this post
    > while I contacted Microsoft, and they removed the script.
    > 
    > You're welcome to cry censorship, limited disclosure, hypocrisy, etc...
    > The posts won't be let through to the list unless someone has something
    > really useful to say.
    > 
    > This is in line with my policy for the list, as stated in administrivia
    > notes.  In most cases, I will not allow a post that contains info on
    > how to nail a unique site.  This is not the same as a client hole,
    > or a service that many people run, or a CSS problem that user
    > education can fix.  No one could have (legitimately) fixed that 
    > hole except the webmaster for that site.  
    > 
    > If you have info on that site, and I allowed the post immediately, then
    > you would have been screwed.  I might have info there, I really can't 
    > remember.  Doesn't have anything to do with my decision, though.
    > 
    > I post the information now, because I think that despite the fact that 
    > the problem is now gone, it is important to have a track record, so
    > that you can be informed about the security of a site you might
    > do business with.  So, now you know, and no one but the poster, myself,
    > and whoever else he told or figured it out on their own had a chance to
    > exploit it.
    > 
    > I will do this again in the future should it come up.  About the only
    > time I won't hold the post is if the poster has admitted to breaking
    > the law, i.e. if a site were defaced, and the attacker posts to the
    > list with details of how they did it, that post is going right through.
    > (Because if you give me the info, and I keep it to myself, then you've
    > made me an accessory to the crime.)
    > 
    >      BB
    > 
    > 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 11 2002 - 15:32:59 PST