Re: ls bug.

From: Ehud Tenenbaum (analyzerat_private)
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 06:04:34 PST

Next message: Wodahs Latigid: "Re: ls bug."

Previous message: Ehud Tenenbaum: "ls bug."
Maybe in reply to: Ehud Tenenbaum: "ls bug."
Next in thread: Crist J. Clark: "Re: ls bug."
Next in thread: Wodahs Latigid: "Re: ls bug."
Reply: Crist J. Clark: "Re: ls bug."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hey again...

Well no point to flame someone for making a mistake
no big deal we are sorry for posting this ls bug which is not a bug.

We already updates the scanner for this shell expending so this incident
would not occur in the future, nevertheless there is no need to
flame us,  we are only trying to do our best.

thanks for the information, until next time:P

Petrus : 2 ways to delete -ls ? well here is one rm -rf /full/path/-ls
second one
         rm -rf ./-ls  :P

"Crist J. Clark" wrote:
>   $ touch -- -i
>   $ rm *
> 
> And see what happens.
> 
> Please get a clue.
> 
> BB, you let this one through just for the entertainment value, no?

Oh well too bad there are people like that one who just have to show
how smart they are when someone else mistaken.

Thats all for now,
2xs Security team.

-- 
------------
Ehud Tenenbaum
C.T.O & Project Manager 
2xs LTD. 
Tel: 972-9-9519980
Fax: 972-9-9519982
E-Mail: ehudat_private
------------ 
                                 Have A Safe Day

Next message: Wodahs Latigid: "Re: ls bug."
Previous message: Ehud Tenenbaum: "ls bug."
Maybe in reply to: Ehud Tenenbaum: "ls bug."
Next in thread: Crist J. Clark: "Re: ls bug."
Next in thread: Wodahs Latigid: "Re: ls bug."
Reply: Crist J. Clark: "Re: ls bug."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 09:44:04 PST