Re: compress(vul) + ftpd(?)

From: HypH (hyphenat_private)
Date: Sat Mar 09 2002 - 12:32:38 PST

Next message: hotx: "strange win2k behavior"

Previous message: KF: "Re: compress(vul) + ftpd(?)"
In reply to: KF: "Re: compress(vul) + ftpd(?)"
Next in thread: Pavel Kankovsky: "Re: compress(vul) + ftpd(?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat  9. March 2002 15:44, KF wrote:
> Would wild cards help out?
Wild cards only work with mget but compress`ing on the fly 
doesn`t work with mget .
So the answer is no. :-(
> -KF
>
> >even if you create some dirs you can`t send a command string that is
> >longer than 200 chars and so you can`t get /SOME/DIRS/1100/CHRS/LONG/foo.Z
> >Any other ideas..?? :-))

-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Were All Born Original 
Most Die As Copies
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Next message: hotx: "strange win2k behavior"
Previous message: KF: "Re: compress(vul) + ftpd(?)"
In reply to: KF: "Re: compress(vul) + ftpd(?)"
Next in thread: Pavel Kankovsky: "Re: compress(vul) + ftpd(?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 09 2002 - 13:23:51 PST