RE: IDS and SSL

From: Bojan Zdrnja (Bojan.Zdrnjaat_private)
Date: Sun Mar 24 2002 - 05:17:10 PST

  • Next message: NDR113 NDR113: "Re: pure IE code injection"

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jason Lewis [mailto:jlewisat_private]
    > Sent: 21. ozujak 2002 21:17
    > To: 'Oliver Petruzel'; 'zeno'; vuln-devat_private;
    > bugtraqat_private; webappsecat_private;
    > focus-idsat_private
    > Subject: RE: IDS and SSL
    >
    
    > These offload encryption and allow me to drop a NIDS next to the
    > webservers,
    > where all the traffic is un-encrypted.  I already had the Alteon
    > infrastructure, and the iSD's won't work without them so YMMV.
    
    But aren't you doing a wrong thing here ?
    If you ask me, you're creating a weak point in encryption chain. If someone
    hypothetically speaking gets cotnrol of that Alteon (I'm not familiar with
    that device though), or of any point behind it (between that box and your
    web server) they can normally sniff all the traffic because, as you said,
    it's un-encrypted.
    
    I think encryption chain should be from web server point to client point in
    this matter.
    I know you have other benefits like acceleration but I think you are loosing
    a bit on security here.
    
    Just my 2 cents,
    
    Best regards,
    
    Bojan Zdrnja
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Mar 24 2002 - 08:27:00 PST