--- "Deus, Attonbitus" <Thorat_private> wrote: > 4) Jonathan Bloomquist and others actively connect > to offenders to send net > messages to the console. Pretty cool. I should clarify - that script was posted to slashdot and I didn't write it. I don't admin any production web servers, just ones I build in my test environments so I have not actually run that script. > > Next Step: > I will probably proceed with my project, taking into > account the > suggestions of the posters. One thing now interests > me more... > In the vein of JBloomquist's post and another poster > who said to > reverse-patch the systems, I am willing to peek into > Pandora's Box and > explore that precise option- > Waiting for an attack, and then reverse-patching the > box. Please don't > tell me about the legal ramifications- I don't care > about that yet. What I > would like to know is if anyone has such an animal, > or how one would go > about reverse-patching an attacking system-- I can't > write that code, but > would really like to try it out. I lean more to the side of shaming the admins into fixing them than ignoring them. However, sending a message is one thing, but actually patching their box is going a bit too far for me even if it is to help them. Warn 'em, shame 'em, scream at 'em, and mail bomb their ISP until they take action, but make each site patch themselves. "If we kill 'em they won't learn nuthin'." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 08 2002 - 11:38:18 PDT