Re: Possible flaw in XFree?

From: Edsel Adap (edselat_private)
Date: Sat Jun 29 2002 - 00:19:29 PDT

Next message: Philipp Buehler: "Re: OpenSSh 3.4p1 PrivilegeSerparation experiment"

Previous message: FBO: "Re: possible stack flow in bash"
In reply to: William N. Zanatta: "Re: Possible flaw in XFree?"
Next in thread: Andy Wood: "FW: Possible flaw in XFree?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

xlock is supposed to lock the X Session... Not the system.
Even if you press ctrl-alt-del or ctrl-alt-FN to get to a console, the
X session still remains locked.  So xlock is doing its job.  No bug
here.

If you want to lock the consoles, just leave them at the login prompt.

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 02:34:01PM -0300, William N. Zanatta wrote:
> The 
> problem I see is: once the X session is locked, it is suposed to LOCK 
> the system

>    william

-- 
Edsel Adap
edselat_private
http://www.adap.org/~edsel/          LINUX - the choice of the GNU generation

"Netscape is an application which grows to fill all available memory."  - me

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Next message: Philipp Buehler: "Re: OpenSSh 3.4p1 PrivilegeSerparation experiment"
Previous message: FBO: "Re: possible stack flow in bash"
In reply to: William N. Zanatta: "Re: Possible flaw in XFree?"
Next in thread: Andy Wood: "FW: Possible flaw in XFree?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 29 2002 - 09:51:04 PDT