Re: Ports 0-1023?

From: Robert Bihlmeyer (robbeat_private)
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 11:57:41 PDT

  • Next message: FX: "RE: Default passwords for TSO and CICS ?"

    Blue Boar <BlueBoarat_private> writes:
    
    > With the proposed change, sshd could only get root if someone with the
    > actual root password comes along and hands it to the sshd.
    
    Keep in mind that password is far from the only method to authenticate
    with sshd. IOW that involves much work, and the gain over a privsep'd
    sshd is not that great.
    
    imapd or similar could be better targets: since modern Unices support
    fd passing over process boundaries, it should be possible to build a
    portable daemon that, in exchange for a user's password, would return
    a O_RDWR file descriptor to that user's mail spool. This way imapd
    only needs root for bind() and can drop it immediately (or you run it
    from inetd and friends).
    
    -- 
    Robbe
    
    
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 08 2002 - 13:48:23 PDT