RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY

From: Rob Shein (shotenat_private)
Date: Fri Nov 01 2002 - 10:45:11 PST

  • Next message: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY"

    There are FCC regulations that specifically prohibit producing
    interference with other devices.  This is why there aren't any radar
    jammers for cars, just radar detectors.  The few products that claimed
    to be jammers were shown to be little more than reflectors, and bad ones
    at that.  Casinos use architectural features to limit emanations (and
    inbound energy as well) in conjunction with limited jamming; since the
    jamming does not exit the premises of the building, it is not within FCC
    jurisdiction.  My neighbor and good friend is on the FCC general
    counsel; I just asked her...apparently if it goes outside of a building
    it's in their domain.
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: k w [mailto:infosecat_private] 
    > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 6:23 PM
    > To: vuln-devat_private
    > Subject: RE: TOTAL WIRELESS SECURITY
    > 
    > 
    > hi,
    > 
    > a few comments, experiences.
    > 
    > > From:     "Rob Shein" <shotenat_private>
    > > Date:     2002-10-31 21:56:56
    > >
    > > Depends...if these areas are small and surrounded by places 
    > where cell 
    > > phones/pagers/etc flourish, there's just about no way. You're also 
    > > going to have a problem with cellular detection in that only law 
    > > enforcement is allowed to have devices that scan on those 
    > frequencies.  
    > > A better bet might
    > 
    > not true.  if you have a business need for the equipment, you 
    > can get FCC permits easily.  examples of "business need" 
    > include cellular/paging service providers, "technical service 
    > organizations qualified to own such equipment as part of 
    > their legally authorized duties"**, infosec auditors / 
    > pen-testers, etc.  dealers like bander.com and grove-ent.com, 
    > and of course the FCC, can provide you with the necessary info.
    > 
    > you are more likely to meet resistance to use of scanners 
    > from local government entities.  ALOT of cities and towns in 
    > the US have local ordinances that prohibit the use of ALL 
    > scanners - especially while in moving vehicles.  most of 
    > those local ordinances do of course provide stipulations that 
    > allow permits for certain applications.  in practice, i have 
    > found that permits are rarely granted though unless you know 
    > how to apply.  you just need to talk to the right local 
    > officials, and make sure your permit application is properly 
    > worded and submitted.  
    > 
    > sometimes, you simply cannot get a local permit.  i hired a 
    > law firm to investigate the legality of these local 
    > ordinances, and they are convinced that the ordinances are 
    > unconstitutional (several times over).  they were more than 
    > happy to fight pro bono if the need ever arose.
    > 
    > > merely be jamming them all, but that is also illegal under FCC 
    > > regulations.
    > 
    > again, not true.  lots of businesses in the US use jamming 
    > equipment, and it can easily be bought in the US.  check out 
    > Netline or Wireless Tech.  casinos commonly use "jamming 
    > technologies".  the FCC just has not yet specifically 
    > *legalized* jamming.
    > 
    > Regards,
    > 
    > ken williams
    > 
    > p.s.  I love the Internet.  great place to buy all sorts of 
    > neat electronic equipment.
    > 
    > ** http://www.grove-ent.com/professional.html
    > -- 
    > ____________________________________________________
    > Get your own Hello Kitty email @ www.sanriotown.com
    > 
    > Powered by Outblaze
    > 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Nov 03 2002 - 10:19:36 PST