Re: Administrivia: List Announcement

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 23:52:03 PDT

  • Next message: Jon Erickson: "Re: vulndev1.c solution (warning SPOILER)"

    On Tue, 13 May 2003 15:11:05 EDT, Bernie Cosell <bernieat_private>  said:
    
    > that's clearly off by one and so the loop will run at least one char past 
    > the end of buf1, clobbering one byte beyond the end of the chunk of space 
    > that got malloc'ed for buf1.
    > 
    > What harm that causes is hard to evaluate, though, isn't it?  Doesn't it 
    > depend a lot on how a particular C compiler lays things out and how the 
    > libraries (in particular, malloc) work and what else the program has been 
    > doing?
    
    Amazingly enough, the hole in XNTPD a while back was just this - a one byte
    overflow.  It was possible to leverage that into a complete remote exploit.
    
    
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri May 16 2003 - 00:38:23 PDT