Re: exploiting a binary if %edi can be overwritten?

From: avelat_private
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 07:15:14 PDT

Next message: flur: "crashing explorer with file properties"

Previous message: sam_secat_private: "file hiding under Linux"
In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: exploiting a binary if %edi can be overwritten?"
Next in thread: avelat_private: "Re: exploiting a binary if %edi can be overwritten?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Although the context here is implied to be Linux on an x86 CPU, it's good
>  to remember that there are other Unixoids that run on an x86 (the *BSD
and S
> olaris/X86, right off the top of my head) which may have different linkage
conventions,
> and that Linux runs on other processors that don't have a %edi register..
>
>
.> For all Unixoid boxes, 'uname -a' should be specific enough:
> 
> % uname -a
> Linux turing-police.cc.vt.edu 2.5.72-mm3-lsm1 #3 Sun Jun 22 13:10:38 EDT 
> 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

Ok, here's my uname:
>uname -a
FreeBSD xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan  3
13:04:38 GMT 2002     rootat_private:/usr/src/sys/compile/bampe  i386

thanks!

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!

Next message: flur: "crashing explorer with file properties"
Previous message: sam_secat_private: "file hiding under Linux"
In reply to: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private: "Re: exploiting a binary if %edi can be overwritten?"
Next in thread: avelat_private: "Re: exploiting a binary if %edi can be overwritten?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 24 2003 - 15:57:45 PDT