Re: security holes, notification protocols, and a clarification

From: Elmer Joandi (elmer_jat_private)
Date: Fri May 15 1998 - 10:41:07 PDT

  • Next message: Berislav Todorovic: "Re: Bay Networks Security Hole"

    Yep. I am sorry too, for all the people who got damaged within those 17
    hours.
    But I still hold the opinion that my path was correct.
    Talking to people around me I found that my way of thinking is hard to
    follow. That is why I want now to make clear points on that.
    
    1. The hole was SUPER-EASY to find. Any responsible sysadmin looks time by
    time for processes listening on ports. And first telnet into that port
    (with all of its verbosity) made the problem very clean.
    Now (major): how did it came that nobody in world found it within 3 months?
    And (minor): nobody in Cygnus found it in stages of deep software testing
    Cygnus products are hopefully going trough.
    There is NO reasonable anwser for me (apart from ones in sci-fi or global
    paranoia domain). I think it is wider problem than just a security hole in
    a program.
    If anyone could explain, I'd be thankful. Otherways the answer is: "kill
    the internet" or similar out of the band one.
    
    2. Cygnus is in central position in software industry and egcs+gcc users
    base is a way greater than SN users base.
    
    3. I had my very own right to be paranoid. I used it and I will use it in
    future in similar cases.
    
    Peace, anyway.
    
    Elmer Joandi
    AS Cybernetica, http://www.cyber.ee/
    http://www.ut.ee/~elmer_j/
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:53:39 PDT