Re: Anonymous Qmail Denial of Service

From: Snob Art Genre (benedictat_private)
Date: Sun Jan 10 1999 - 07:49:41 PST

  • Next message: Jon Ribbens: "Buffer overflow in www.boutell.com cgic library"

    On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
    
    > "D. J. Bernstein" <djbat_private> writes:
    > > News flash: There are dozens of denial-of-service attacks on every MTA.
    >
    > I think that was the whole point that Wietse was making. You attacked
    > Postfix for being subject to a DoS attack. He pointed out that you
    > suffered from them, too. Seemed like fair game to me.
    
    I think that Dan has a valid point though, that (if I understand
    correctly) the Postfix DoS breaks RFC compliance, because it can cause
    mail to get lost, whereas the qmail DoS that Wietse pointed out simply
    incapacitates the mail server.
    
    
     Ben
    
    "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:28:26 PDT