At 08:45 1999-04-08 -0400, you wrote: >>Well, my box was win 98, and the remote box I tested it against was >>win 95. Didn't have anyone running NT handy to test against. However, >>another person I corresponded with who was testing this did get it to >>drop a 95 box, but not every time. Did it every time for me; but there's >>apparently other factors that contribute as well. >> >>-- >>Ron Jarrell >>VA Tech Computing Center > >I try to test this on my NT box ( NT server 4.00.1381, Sevice pack 3 ) and I >could not reproduce the error. I've used ICQ Version 99a Beta v.2.13 Build >1700. It would be beneficial if Ron Jarrell or Jan Vogelgesang, explained >the procedure that they carried out to arrive to the error detailedly. > >Best regards, Jose. I tested it against my own win98 box with IE5 final (english) result: I was vulnerable. My friend with win98 and ie4 (french) result: vulnerable An other friend with win98 and IE5 (french) result: vulnerable we were all using ICQ99a build 1700 Method used: telnet to port 80 send: QUIT <LF> it disconnects after 5 to 10 seconds. , | | Kaven Rousseau | rousseauat_private | FingerPrint: F1C8 F915 9F0F DD5E DACB 024B 5C6F 163D F097 40D6 `------------------- ---- -- -
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 14:41:53 PDT