Re: RH 6.0 shadow passwords and locking users bug

From: Alex Alvarez (eajamat_private)
Date: Mon Sep 06 1999 - 18:23:50 PDT

  • Next message: Norbert Warmuth: "Re: [Linux] glibc 2.1.x / wu-ftpd <=2.5 / BeroFTPD / lynx / vlock"

    I tried both on RH 6.0 without any problem whatsoever.  Then again, I've
    continuously update the systems following RH Errata recommendations,
    http://www.redhat.com/corp/support/errata/rh60-errata-general.html
    
    Cheers, A
    
    
    >From: Shuman <shumanat_private>
    >Reply-To: Shuman <shumanat_private>
    >To: BUGTRAQat_private
    >Subject: Re: RH 6.0 shadow passwords and locking users bug
    >Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 05:24:02 +0600
    >
    >On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Prince Ctrl wrote:
    >[ When administering a Red Hat 6.0 server and locking users with the
    >[ 'passwd -l <user>' command, and then unlocking a user with the 'passwd
    >[ -u <user>' command, a control character is added to the end of a
    >[ users' encrypted password in the form of a "^Q" in the shadowed passwd
    >[ file.
    >
    >The "usermod" program, a part of shadow-utils that comes with RedHat 6.0
    >has a similar feature and does NOT has this "^Q" problem when unlocking.
    >
    >To lock an account:
    >usermod -L username
    >
    >To unlock an account:
    >usermod -U username
    >
    >[ OS affected/tested: Red Hat 6.0
    >
    >Too bad, I just upgraded the last RH 5.2 box to 6.0 today!
    >
    >---
    >M S Anam                                       <shumanat_private>
    >
    >Annex Group, Bangladesh                            We hack to learn!
    >
    >Those who can't write, write manuals.
    
    ______________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:01:52 PDT