Ingress/egress filters can be problematic, its not just a performance
problem. With upstream providers being real harsh on handing out IP
ranges, and insisting that every IP subnet be used regardless of how many
criss cross routes we have to put in our many routers to do it, the access
lists also become complicated and prone to error.
One can be unforgiving and say "So what, its the ISP's job to do it
right." but many ISP's opt to keep it simple. For example presently we
have filters on our border routers, but not our inner routers which have
complex criss cross routing tables as we send subnets in every which
direction. Thus presumably our customers can spoof each other, but not
the external world.
If it gets out of hand we will take the next step.
Of course you are right though, much of the way to keep people from
coming in and doing damage is for everyone to make sure their customers
can't get out and do damage. This is really the only workable model for
stopping spam, you stop it going out, as stopping it from coming in is
hopeless.
Homer
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homer Wilson Smith Clear Air, Clear Water, Art Matrix - Lightlink
(607) 277-0959 A Green Earth and Peace. Internet Access, Ithaca NY
homerat_private Is that too much to ask? http://www.lightlink.com
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Darren Reed wrote:
> In some mail from Elias Levy, sie said:
> [...]
> > Network Ingress Filtering:
> > --------------------------
> >
> > All network access providers should implement network ingress filtering
> > to stop any of their downstream networks from injecting packets with
> > faked or "spoofed" addressed into the Internet.
> >
> > Although this does not stop an attack from occurring it does make it
> > much easier to track down the source of the attack and terminate it
> > quickly.
> >
> > For information on network ingress filtering read RFC 2267:
> > http://info.internet.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc/files/rfc2267.txt
>
> You know if anyone was of a mind to find someone at fault over this,
> I'd start pointing the finger at ISP's who haven't been doing this
> due to "performance reasons". They've had the ability to do it for
> years and in doing so would seriously reduce the number and possibility
> of "spoofing" attacks.
>
> Darren
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 15:34:46 PDT