Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS?

From: Pavel Machek (pavelat_private)
Date: Mon Jul 09 2001 - 04:59:28 PDT

  • Next message: Peter Mell: "NIST Gives Away Vulnerability Database"

    Hi!
    
    > If any of you have tested what happens to the ability of a box to
    > perform well when it has a small MTU you will know that setting the
    > MTY to (say) 56 on a diskless thing is a VERY VERY bad idea when NFS
    > read/write packets are generally 8k in size.  Do not try it on a NFS
    > thing unless you plan to reboot it, ok ?  Last time I did this was
    > when I worked out you could fragment packets inside the TCP header
    > and that lesson was enough for me ;_)
    
    AFAI can remember, there's minimum MTU defined for IP (something like 576)...
    ...and then there are networks like hamradio that use lower MTU. They are
    really non-compliant, but Linux wants them to work.
    								Pavel
    -- 
    Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
    details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 22:16:56 PDT