Re: Multiple-Vendor-FTP-Vuln. (old?)

From: Michael Faurot (mfaurotat_private)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 12:20:00 PDT

Next message: Mark Lastdrager: "security problem in surf-net ASP Discussion Forum < 2.30"

Previous message: David LeBlanc: "RE: HTML email "bug", of sorts."
Next in thread: Robert van der Meulen: "Re: Multiple-Vendor-FTP-Vuln. (old?)"
Next in thread: skip: "Re: Multiple-Vendor-FTP-Vuln. (old?)"
Reply: Robert van der Meulen: "Re: Multiple-Vendor-FTP-Vuln. (old?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Enrico Kern <IphantomIat_private> wrote:
: Hi,

: i tested an old proftpd bug (ls /../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*/../*) on =
: many new Linux-Dist.. 

This bug appears to still be present with Debian Stable (Potato) which
uses ProFTPd v1.2.0pre10.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Michael | mfaurot  | Give your child mental blocks for Christmas.
 Faurot  | atww.org |

Next message: Mark Lastdrager: "security problem in surf-net ASP Discussion Forum < 2.30"
Previous message: David LeBlanc: "RE: HTML email "bug", of sorts."
Next in thread: Robert van der Meulen: "Re: Multiple-Vendor-FTP-Vuln. (old?)"
Next in thread: skip: "Re: Multiple-Vendor-FTP-Vuln. (old?)"
Reply: Robert van der Meulen: "Re: Multiple-Vendor-FTP-Vuln. (old?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Aug 20 2001 - 12:54:49 PDT