Paul Starzetz <paulat_private> writes: > Be sure that this will be fixed in the next 'generation' of LRKM's. > Patching the device methods for disk special nodes is not a big deal - > why not to incorporate even your code into one of the nice LRKM's? You > probably found a weaknes of 'current' LRKM's but in general it is a bad > idea to check your machine while running a compromised kernel. I agree. You can never be sure which kernel you are running. An attacker could have placed a modified kernel on a swap device (which excludes this very area from being used as swap space), and tweaked the boot loader to load the modified kernel. Using this approach, the modified kernel image can be made completely invisible easily, and it still survives reboot. Such a modification is very hard to spot even during an offline analysis, and the checklists I've seen so far do not address this problem at all. -- Florian Weimer Weimerat_private-Stuttgart.DE University of Stuttgart http://CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE/people/fw/ RUS-CERT +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 17 2002 - 18:32:40 PDT