Wil Cooley writes: > Also Sprach Toby <toby@private> on Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:44:28PM PDT > > > > Actually, to the best of my knowledge this is not the case anymore (if it > > was at one point I don't know). Right now the compute farms contain > > multiple OS- WindowsNT, Windows2K, Linux, HPUX, AIX to name just some of > > them. The people who care for them are rediculously good- hence their > > ability to manage them effectively and keep stable and secured builds. > > Wow, HP-UX and AIX? These are the two systems that AFAIK DO NOT > run on Intel platforms. (Tru64, given that DEC/Compaq out-sources > their Alpha fabrication to Intel /at least/ serves Intel's profit > interests.) Long, Long ago in a galaxy far far away, systems based on Intel processors were not built powerful enough to do chip development. While that isn't the case anymore, never let it be said that Intel lets a single processor cycle go to waste or a single system get replaced before it has been used up. t > > Wil > -- > W. Reilly Cooley wcooley@private > Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc > irc.linux.com #orlug,#lnxs > > "There was a vague, unpleasant manginess about his appearence; he somehow > seemed dirty, though a close glance showed him as carefully shaven as an > actor, and clad in immaculate linen." > -- H.L. Mencken, on the death of William Jennings Bryan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun May 26 2002 - 11:40:45 PDT