On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Farrimond, Ronald - KN-7 wrote: > If we use Alan's definition and you go back to the original e-mail. The link in the e-mail is to an unsolicited commercial e-mail/website. Therefore, I have to assume that Alan agrees that this is SPAM even though he seems to be in a state of denial!!! > > Thank you Alan for that clarification. You are twisting my words for your own benefit. Toby's post was not a bulk solicitation. It was a posting to a mailing list of a url of interest. If any posting that includes a URL to web site with something to sell on it is spam, then every posting of a URL can be clasified as spam. The only reason, it appears, that you reguard it as spam is that you disagree with its content. You are willing to be obstanate and clueless to further that position. I have better thing to do than to argue with you about it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 13 2003 - 14:26:39 PST