RE: CRIME Privacy Vs Security

From: Dorning, Kevin E - DI-3 (kedorning@private)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 07:27:08 PDT

  • Next message: Warren Harrison: "Re: CRIME Privacy Vs Security"

    The whole purpose of providing security is to protect privacy whether it be of the corporation or the individual.  In business we declare the limits to privacy clearly when we provide access to our business systems.
    Otherwise, personal privacy overrides.   It is our challenge and actually part of the "fun" of being a security agent, to try to outguess the opposition.  We provide protection, and gather intelligence as best we can, and so far it seems that we have done a pretty good job.  I fear the government that reaches to far into the personal privacy of it's citizens.  And this is from one who knows the benefits, from the security management side, of having a long reach.  This is an area where we need to exercise great care, and err on the side of privacy.  We need to protect privacy and all the other freedoms given by the Constitution.
    
    K.d>
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Shaun Savage [mailto:savages@private]
    Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 2:16 PM
    To: CRIME
    Subject: CRIME Privacy Vs Security
    
    
    Senator Wyden fights for privacy!
    
    The question I ask the group is "At what point does security out weigh 
    the privacy and freedoms that America should offer?"
    
    
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/06/08/MN253740.DTL
    
    Shaun
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jun 09 2003 - 08:02:20 PDT