On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 19:53, Robert Johnston wrote: > I found some rather "in_your_face" language in the original bill that needed > taming and did so. This is most likely why it got killed in committee. > Bob, You should really track the history in the Plug list (plug.skylab.org) before commenting like this. If you had you would realize you are dead wrong above. You are more wrong than you realize, and the committee chair (A member of C.R.I.M.E.) would probably find the above amusing. As would other members on this list who met with the committees. The whole process has been very well documented. Ken Barber (the real push behind the bill) came up 3 months and talk. There will be links to his editorial against Karen Minnis and her response. Ken is very approachable and would love your help I am sure, but do your home work first! > Attached is my suggested revision (draft) that I will be presenting to the state > this week. > > > ***** > > Robert Johnston > Datajockeys, LLC -- Zot O'Connor http://www.ZotConsulting.com http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 28 2003 - 16:12:41 PDT