RE: 'touch' on Win32

From: crazytrain.com (subscribeat_private)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2002 - 14:15:36 PST

  • Next message: Ryan Barnett: "Using SWATCH for Forensic Analysis of VMware$DD images"

    Carv
    
    a couple of things here.
    
    1) I have had just a couple of instances where touch or similiar was used 
    on a system.  These were servers that were broken into.  I can't say much 
    more than that.
    
    2) I don't think you'll find this too common, as your refer. to the LE 
    response shows.  For home users and most corp. users, I don't think they'll 
    take the time to use such a tool.   
    For a skilled person, this is where everything goes out the window.  I 
    think if you look to the environment, say finance/banking, that'll be 
    indicative if such a tool MAY be used.   
    
    Sure, anything, anywhere, anytime is possible.  But, again, in most cases, 
    I don't think you'll need to worry about this.   When you have a high 
    profile, hush hush environment, wherein there is a purposeful and driving 
    reason to mod. file times, that is where I would start to look.
    
    hope this helps
    
    farmerdude
    
    
    
    > I'm failing to see the point of this response.
    > 
    > > A Win32 port of the Unix touch utility is available
    > > at
    > > http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/.  This port is a
    > > native Win32
    > > application and does not require Cygwin or a perl
    > > interpreter.  
    > 
    > My original post never said, "Hey look at this new
    > thing I've done."  In fact, I am fully aware that it
    > isn't new at all.  The Perl script that I wrote was
    > intended to show, programmatically, *how* this is
    > done.  The SetFileTime() API, for example, doesn't
    > seem to require Administrator privileges.
    > 
    > Further, the script I wrote changes all of the
    > FILETIMES, not just last access and modification.
    > 
    > The issue I see is that this sort of functionality
    > could have potentially devastating effects on
    > forensics analysis and prosecution...which is the
    > reason I asked the questions in my original post
    > (neither of which, by the way, was "where can I get
    > another touch utility?").
    > 
    > I have spoken to a few individuals who have experience
    > in the forensics field from the LE perspective. 
    > Fortunately, none of the ones I spoke to have seen
    > this sort of functionality in place during an
    > investigation.
    > 
    > Carv
    > 
    > 
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
    > http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
    > 
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------
    > This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
    > For more information on this free incident handling, management 
    > and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
    > 
    > 
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
    For more information on this free incident handling, management 
    and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 14 2002 - 03:44:09 PST