RE: Multi-media friendly Firewalls

From: arkat_private
Date: Wed Feb 02 2000 - 03:58:36 PST

Next message: Antonomasia: "Re: Paper on why I need a security Assessment"

Previous message: jason.wangat_private: "Re: Paper on why I need a security Assessment"
Next in thread: carsonat_private: "RE: Multi-media friendly Firewalls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nuqneH,

I remember there was a nasty thingie in 3.x lp-gw..
Gauntlet is still the best for protecting LAN (except maybe UW Cyberguard), 
imho.

"Staggs, Michael" <Michael_Staggsat_private> said :
,
> muliple fw policy console management, a long legacy of NO exploits and an 

                                     _     _  _  _  _      _  _
 {::} {::} {::}  CU in Hell          _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
 (##) (##) (##)        /Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|
 [||] [||] [||]            Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOJgb66H/mIJW9LeBAQEljgP+L7jN5C1Df4k5RAG20kP+MaMNKpT+1W8d
5hanobdjeOVpz/9JdV5jHXUdTJNdeV3QdytEUvS5RWHDePCNWYNqfDdml8NT9gss
8ViMK3/EEDvZlaF11UczMGvp2cWhXpaehvVdDjj9iV8+oMhgPN4E/m7qlUQ0uiK6
Qjlx7+pZlyk=
=wlY2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Next message: Antonomasia: "Re: Paper on why I need a security Assessment"
Previous message: jason.wangat_private: "Re: Paper on why I need a security Assessment"
Next in thread: carsonat_private: "RE: Multi-media friendly Firewalls"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 13 2001 - 13:59:58 PDT