"Philip J. Koenig" wrote: > > Now Checkpoint has commissioned a test that purports to show > their product performs better than "dedicated hardware" from > Cisco and Netscreen. I would like to have people's opinion > on this test, in part because my observation of Tolly Group > test reports is that they're one of these "guns for hire" > that never writes a bad review for someone who pays them for > one. Gag. It wouldn't cause me so much heartburn if the title and intro specified they were only measuring raw VPN throughput. While the title of the report says: "Competitive Evaluation of Enterprise-Class Internet Security Solutions" the evaluation is pretty limited: "Engineers configured the DUT as a single-rule, allow-all firewall" -- Gary Flynn Security Engineer - Technical Services James Madison University Please R.U.N.S.A.F.E. http://www.jmu.edu/computing/runsafe _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizardsat_private http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 16 2002 - 14:25:49 PDT