"What we have here is failure to communicate..." I think that the issue here is the various nomenclatures that have been given to Code Red. Here are the versions as I understand it, with names that I have seen each called. You'll notice the discrepancies: Code Red == Code Red I == CRvI (original) Code Red I version 2 == Code Red II == CRv2 (no backdoor, same codebase as first) Code Red II == Code Red III == CRvIII (leaves the backdoors) The first column is what I have been using. To bad this was not standardized somehow, because it has caused a fair amount of confusion. So I believe the article is referring to what I call Code Red II. dmuz ----- Original Message ----- From: Steve Halligan <agent33at_private> To: Incidents (E-mail) <INCIDENTSat_private> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 11:02 AM Subject: What the *** is this Check this out. Is this media nonsense, or is there really something to it? http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6835996.html -Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 15:14:16 PDT