>> I'm curious to see how other feel about this. Is it: >> >> 1) Recommended. Go for it and publish the IP's and let the "Gods of IP" >> sort out the damage. >> 2) A Bad Thing. These are innocent victims, and you will just have them >> be attacked by evil people. >> 3) Boring. Who cares? It's Nimda, and an everyday part of life. Deal >> with it and ignore the logs. > > > If you have Apache et.al. No3 is the best option. ;-) > > Everything else, like building lists of vulnerable IPs can either be > considered a "hobby" or will help script-kiddies and IRC-weenies build > an army of zombies in the medium term. > > ARIN (+RIPE + APNIC + ...) information isn't very reliable anyway. > There have been several threads about this. > And if you've complained to SPAM before, you may already know this. hrm, I have to disagree here. 9 times out of 10, if you want contact information, the RIPEdb will supply *correct* contact information. And opsat_private will *always* try to help you out if you don't get correct contact information. Cheers, Mally Mclane RIPE NCC Operations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 08 2002 - 11:23:06 PDT